From: Jill.Ramonsky@Aculab.com
Date: Tue Aug 19 2003 - 05:32:49 EDT
Well that just proves my point then.
There are indeed some things that DO need to support the whole of Unicode
(more or less).
Jill
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Kirk [mailto:peter.r.kirk@ntlworld.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 10:30 AM
To: Jill.Ramonsky@Aculab.com
Cc: unicode@unicode.org
Subject: Re: Clones (was RE: Hexadecimal)
On 19/08/2003 01:58, Jill.Ramonsky@Aculab.com wrote:
>I disagree.
>
>A post-Windows, post-Linux, Operating System for the 21st century intended
>for global use, should ideally support the whole of Unicode.
>
>There are, in fact, people working on such projects.
>Jill
>
>
>
>
Well, whatever might be new about this OS, it is not its Unicode
support. Windows XP and Linux already support the whole of Unicode, more
or less.
-- Peter Kirk peter@qaya.org (personal) peterkirk@qaya.org (work) http://www.qaya.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Aug 19 2003 - 07:18:10 EDT