RE: Clones (was RE: Hexadecimal)

From: Jill.Ramonsky@Aculab.com
Date: Tue Aug 19 2003 - 05:32:49 EDT

  • Next message: Peter Kirk: "Re: [Way OT] Beer measurements (was: Re: Handwritten EURO sign)"

    Well that just proves my point then.
    There are indeed some things that DO need to support the whole of Unicode
    (more or less).

    Jill

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Peter Kirk [mailto:peter.r.kirk@ntlworld.com]
    Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 10:30 AM
    To: Jill.Ramonsky@Aculab.com
    Cc: unicode@unicode.org
    Subject: Re: Clones (was RE: Hexadecimal)

    On 19/08/2003 01:58, Jill.Ramonsky@Aculab.com wrote:

    >I disagree.
    >
    >A post-Windows, post-Linux, Operating System for the 21st century intended
    >for global use, should ideally support the whole of Unicode.
    >
    >There are, in fact, people working on such projects.
    >Jill
    >
    >
    >
    >
    Well, whatever might be new about this OS, it is not its Unicode
    support. Windows XP and Linux already support the whole of Unicode, more
    or less.

    -- 
    Peter Kirk
    peter@qaya.org (personal)
    peterkirk@qaya.org (work)
    http://www.qaya.org/
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Aug 19 2003 - 07:18:10 EDT