RE: Proposed Draft UTR #31 - Syntax Characters

From: Marco Cimarosti (
Date: Mon Aug 25 2003 - 08:07:37 EDT

  • Next message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Proposed Draft UTR #31 - Syntax Characters"

    Peter Kirk wrote:
    > >Well, the requirement for an invariable set seems to be part
    > >of the "rules of the game" with this UTR, so I'll stick to
    > > it.
    > >
    > Well, I was taking a rather different approach: noting that
    > UTR31 is so far only a "proposed draft", I was suggesting
    > a change to the rules of the game.

    Sorry, but this sounds like nonsense to me... It is as if we were discussing
    the details of a card game, and you popped up to say: "OK, but I suggest
    that only the door-keeper must be allowed to touch the ball with his hands".

    _ Marco

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Aug 25 2003 - 09:30:40 EDT