From: Marco Cimarosti (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Aug 25 2003 - 08:07:37 EDT
Peter Kirk wrote:
> >Well, the requirement for an invariable set seems to be part
> >of the "rules of the game" with this UTR, so I'll stick to
> > it.
> Well, I was taking a rather different approach: noting that
> UTR31 is so far only a "proposed draft", I was suggesting
> a change to the rules of the game.
Sorry, but this sounds like nonsense to me... It is as if we were discussing
the details of a card game, and you popped up to say: "OK, but I suggest
that only the door-keeper must be allowed to touch the ball with his hands".
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Aug 25 2003 - 09:30:40 EDT