Re: Possible error in the Unicode code charts

From: Asmus Freytag (
Date: Tue Sep 30 2003 - 17:45:15 EDT

  • Next message: Chris Jacobs: "Re: Possible error in the Unicode code charts"

    At 10:34 PM 9/30/03 +0200, Stefan Persson wrote:
    >The code charts tells that U+ACs-0308 Combining di+AOY-resis may be used for
    >indicating the +IBw-double derivate.+IB0- I have only heard people
    >calling this
    >the +IBw-second derivate+IB0gFA-is +IBw-double derivate+IB0- a valid name
    >for this?

    The correct term is "second derivative" (not derivate). I'll pass that on
    to the nameslist editor.


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Sep 30 2003 - 18:46:17 EDT