Re: Canonical equivalence in rendering: mandatory or recommended?

From: Peter Kirk (peterkirk@qaya.org)
Date: Thu Oct 16 2003 - 03:26:52 CST


On 16/10/2003 00:26, Doug Ewell wrote:

>Peter Kirk <peterkirk at qaya dot org> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Does everyone agree that "This is not a performance issue"?
>>
>>
>
>You can never tell whether something is going to be a "performance
>issue" -- not just "measurably slower," but actually affecting
>usability -- until you do some profiling. Guessing does no good.
>
>-Doug Ewell
> Fullerton, California
> http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
>
>
>
Well, did the people who wrote this in the standard do some profiling,
or did they just guess? There should be no place in a standard for
statements which are just guesses.

-- 
Peter Kirk
peter@qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk@qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 18 2007 - 15:54:24 CST