Re: Java char and Unicode 3.0+ (was:Canonical equivalence in rendering: mandatory or recommended?)

From: John Cowan (
Date: Thu Oct 16 2003 - 20:29:50 CST

Michael Everson scripsit:

> There is no such thing as a semi-private character. There are
> standardized characters (which have particular meanings), and there
> are private use characters (which are guaranteed to have no meanings
> at all).

There's glory (by which I mean: a nice knockdown argument) for you!

LEAR: Dost thou call me fool, boy?      John Cowan
FOOL: All thy other titles    
             thou hast given away:
      That thou wast born with.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 18 2007 - 15:54:24 CST