From: Michael Everson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sun Oct 26 2003 - 10:33:35 CST
>At 02:08 PM 10/25/03 -0700, Doug Ewell wrote:
>>The Unicode character names attempt to be (a) unique and (b) reasonably
>>mnemonic. Anything beyond that is a bonus. They expressly do *not*
>>represent any form of transliteration or transcription scheme.
That doesn't mean that some of our conventions aren't based on rules
related to various transliteration or transcription schemes.
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 18 2007 - 15:54:24 CST