RE: Hexadecimal digits?

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Mon Nov 10 2003 - 06:51:41 EST

Next message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Clarification, please, was Re: Berber/Tifinagh"

Previous message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Ciphers (Was: Berber/Tifinagh)"
In reply to: Jill Ramonsky: "RE: Hexadecimal digits?"
Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Hexadecimal digits?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 10:42 +0000 2003-11-10, Jill Ramonsky wrote:
>My question went unanswered, so I'll ask it again - do I get a vote?
>
>How does one go about registering support for a proposal? I consider
>myself a relevant interested party, someone who belives that hex
>FFFF should collate before hex 10000 in a "natural sort".

Tailor ISO/IEC 14651.

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Clarification, please, was Re: Berber/Tifinagh"
Previous message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Ciphers (Was: Berber/Tifinagh)"
In reply to: Jill Ramonsky: "RE: Hexadecimal digits?"
Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Hexadecimal digits?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Nov 10 2003 - 07:44:03 EST