Re: ZWJ, ZWNJ, CGJ and combination

From: Philippe Verdy (
Date: Mon Nov 10 2003 - 12:09:00 EST

  • Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Hexadecimal digits?"

    From: "Mark Davis" <>

    > This is unpleasant; I wish I had taken a closer look at the structure for
    > before it went in, because it is very problematic. At this point the UTC
    > have to take up this topic and figure out what to do.

    Time to publish a public review for change of category of ZWJ and ZWNJ from
    "Cf" to "Mn", so that they finally become acceptable within combining

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Nov 10 2003 - 12:50:05 EST