From: Curtis Clark (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Nov 10 2003 - 13:14:39 EST
on 2003-11-10 04:17 Michael Everson wrote:
> It still remains the case that Theban "orthography" is basically
> English, that is, it is Latin with funny glyphs.
Why isn't Latin Serbian just Cyrillic Serbian with funny glyphs? I'm not
trying to be intentionally dense here; Theban English and Serbian are
different in many ways. But are there truly no edge cases, where whim is
the only deciding factor? And how does whim turn into policy?
-- Curtis Clark http://www.csupomona.edu/~jcclark/ Mockingbird Font Works http://www.mockfont.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Nov 10 2003 - 14:05:08 EST