Re: Handy table of combining character classes

From: John Cowan (jcowan@reutershealth.com)
Date: Mon Nov 10 2003 - 14:27:03 EST

Next message: Patrick Andries: "Re: Berber/Tifinagh (was: Swahili & Banthu)"

Previous message: John Hudson: "Re: Ciphers (Was: Berber/Tifinagh)"
In reply to: Andrew C. West: "Re: Handy table of combining character classes"
Next in thread: Markus Scherer: "Re: Handy table of combining character classes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Andrew C. West scripsit:

> 589 ? Aren't all characters that are not 1-240 Combining Class 0 (i.e. Spacing,
> split, enclosing, reordrant, and Tibetan subjoined) ? 235,617 (including 2,048
> surrogate code points) by my reckoning.

Yes. I was enumerating only the combining characters, however.

-- 
John Cowan  www.ccil.org/~cowan  jcowan@reutershealth.com  www.reutershealth.com
[P]olice in many lands are now complaining that local arrestees are insisting
on having their Miranda rights read to them, just like perps in American TV
cop shows.  When it's explained to them that there are in a different country,
where those rights do not exist, they become outraged.  --Neal Stephenson

Next message: Patrick Andries: "Re: Berber/Tifinagh (was: Swahili & Banthu)"
Previous message: John Hudson: "Re: Ciphers (Was: Berber/Tifinagh)"
In reply to: Andrew C. West: "Re: Handy table of combining character classes"
Next in thread: Markus Scherer: "Re: Handy table of combining character classes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Nov 10 2003 - 15:18:29 EST