Re: compatibility characters (in XML context)

From: Stefan Persson (alsjebegrijptwatikbedoel@yahoo.se)
Date: Fri Nov 14 2003 - 15:02:29 EST

Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: compatibility characters (in XML context)"

Previous message: Elaine Keown: "Sample Hebrew character descript: http://www.cox-internet.com/keownlaw/"
In reply to: Alexandre Arcouteil: "Re: compatibility characters (in XML context)"
Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "Re: compatibility characters (in XML context)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Alexandre Arcouteil wrote:
> Is that a clear indication that \u212B is actually a compatibility
> character and then should be, according to XML 1.1 recommandation,
> replaced by the \u00C5 character ?

Isn't U+00C5 a compatibility character for U+0041 U+030A, so that both should be replaced by that?

Stefan

Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: compatibility characters (in XML context)"
Previous message: Elaine Keown: "Sample Hebrew character descript: http://www.cox-internet.com/keownlaw/"
In reply to: Alexandre Arcouteil: "Re: compatibility characters (in XML context)"
Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "Re: compatibility characters (in XML context)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 14 2003 - 15:45:36 EST