From: Stefan Persson (email@example.com)
Date: Fri Nov 14 2003 - 15:02:29 EST
Alexandre Arcouteil wrote:
> Is that a clear indication that \u212B is actually a compatibility
> character and then should be, according to XML 1.1 recommandation,
> replaced by the \u00C5 character ?
Isn't U+00C5 a compatibility character for U+0041 U+030A, so that both should be replaced by that?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 14 2003 - 15:45:36 EST