RE: Definitions

From: Peter Constable (petercon@microsoft.com)
Date: Tue Nov 18 2003 - 15:57:28 EST

Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Ternary search trees for Unicode dictionaries"

Previous message: Peter Constable: "RE: Definitions"
Maybe in reply to: Chris Jacobs: "Definitions"
Next in thread: jameskass@att.net: "RE: Definitions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org]
On Behalf
> Of Peter Kirk

> If the channel starts messing around with the
> characters sent through it, that is what is non-conformant.

Only if it messes with those characters while claiming it is not.

Folks, there is nothing non-conformant about processes that convert
"abc" into "ABC" or "day" into "jour" as long as they are doing what
their owners claim they are doing.

Peter

Peter Constable
Globalization Infrastructure and Font Technologies
Microsoft Windows Division

Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Ternary search trees for Unicode dictionaries"
Previous message: Peter Constable: "RE: Definitions"
Maybe in reply to: Chris Jacobs: "Definitions"
Next in thread: jameskass@att.net: "RE: Definitions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Nov 18 2003 - 16:48:04 EST