From: Peter Kirk (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Nov 19 2003 - 19:35:36 EST
On 19/11/2003 16:26, Philippe Verdy wrote:
>From: "Philippe Verdy" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>>So, <NBSP,CC> must not be treated as if it was:
>>but really rather as:
>>Note here the inversion.
>The inversion here acts as if WJ was a combining character of combining
>class 256 (i.e. with a class higher than the combining class of all other
>"Mn" combining characters) and a canonical reordering was applied to the
>Of course this is not a standard normalization form, but using this pseudo
>combining class may help render the last two coded strings (in my quote
>above) equivalently in renderers.
>This works even in the case where there are multiple diacritics (noted CC1
>and CC2 below):
>is then treated as if it was:
>and then the pseudo-normalization had given:
>(depending on the canonical reordering of CC1 and CC2, i.e. of their
>relative combining class)
This trick doesn't work if any of the CC's are in combining class zero.
-- Peter Kirk email@example.com (personal) firstname.lastname@example.org (work) http://www.qaya.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Nov 19 2003 - 20:22:15 EST