From: Philippe Verdy (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Nov 24 2003 - 19:56:05 EST
Peter Kirk writes:
> If conformance clause C10 is taken to be operable at all levels, this
> makes a nonsense of the concept of normalisation stability within
> databases etc.
I don't think that the stability of normalization influence this: as long as
there's a guarantee of being able to restore any desired normalized form,
processes can use any canonically equivalent representation of strings.
In fact, this stability is a great benefit as it effectively gives the full
freedom to transform strings into canonically equivalent forms if this is
needed: if a database must be built for performance reasons with a
particular normalization form, its interface will then be able to perform
this normalization freely. The same is true for data compression algorithms.
So it's the absence of stability which would make impossible this
rearrangement of normalization forms...
<< ella for Spam Control >> has removed Spam messages and set aside
Newsletters for me
You can use it too - and it's FREE! http://www.ellaforspam.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Nov 24 2003 - 20:59:19 EST