From: Michael Everson (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Nov 25 2003 - 08:27:50 EST
At 08:23 -0500 2003-11-25, John Cowan wrote:
>Michael Everson scripsit:
>> Ridiculous. This happened centuries ago, and it is not "why" Ethiopic
>> was encoded as a syllabary. It was encoded as a syllabary because it
>> is a syllabary.
>Structurally it's an abugida, like Indic and UCAS.
I disagree. And I don't think Canadian Syllabics are an abugida. But
let's leave this one alone, shall we?
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Nov 25 2003 - 09:12:43 EST