Re: Normalisation stability, was: Compression through normalization

From: Rick McGowan (
Date: Tue Nov 25 2003 - 15:29:44 EST

  • Next message: "RE: Request"

    Of course, as usual, this is my opinion. UTC hasn't actually made any
    proclamations about what will or won't be done in terms of the classes or
    what kinds of classes might be assigned in the future.


    > John Cowan suggested...
    > > We will never come close to exceeding this limit. Essentially all new
    > > combining characters are either class 0 or fall into one of the 200-range
    > > positional classes.
    > Or 9, for viramas.
    > One take-home point is that there won't be any more "fixed position"
    > classes added for Hebrew or any other scripts.
    > Rick

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Nov 25 2003 - 16:41:29 EST