RE: Case mapping of dotless lowercase letters

From: Arcane Jill ([email protected])
Date: Tue Dec 16 2003 - 07:18:36 EST

Next message: Jungshik Shin: "Re: [OT] CJK -> CJC (Re: Corea?)"

Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Case mapping of dotless lowercase letters"
Maybe in reply to: Philippe Verdy: "Case mapping of dotless lowercase letters"
Next in thread: [email protected]: "RE: Case mapping of dotless lowercase letters"
Reply: [email protected]: "RE: Case mapping of dotless lowercase letters"
Reply: John Cowan: "Re: Case mapping of dotless lowercase letters"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This occurred to be even before I read Phillppe's email.

Since {U+0069} is /not/ canonically equivalent to {U+0131}{U+0307}, I
don't see anything to stop me from registering the domain name
"un{U+0131}{U+0307}code.org", for example. It /is/ in NFC, after all.

Jill

-----Original Message-----
From: Philippe Verdy [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 2:21 AM
To: Doug Ewell
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Case mapping of dotless lowercase letters

Doug Ewell wrote:

I detected it after it produced a security bug (a user record was
unexpectedly updated on my database...)

Next message: Jungshik Shin: "Re: [OT] CJK -> CJC (Re: Corea?)"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Case mapping of dotless lowercase letters"
Maybe in reply to: Philippe Verdy: "Case mapping of dotless lowercase letters"
Next in thread: [email protected]: "RE: Case mapping of dotless lowercase letters"
Reply: [email protected]: "RE: Case mapping of dotless lowercase letters"
Reply: John Cowan: "Re: Case mapping of dotless lowercase letters"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Dec 16 2003 - 07:57:11 EST