Re: Latin letter GHA or Latin letter IO ?

From: Michael Everson (
Date: Mon Jan 05 2004 - 18:53:13 EST

  • Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Latin letter GHA or Latin letter IO ?"

    At 15:51 -0800 2004-01-05, Peter Kirk wrote:

    >>In Pan-Turkic, though, it looks just like CYRILLIC SOFT SIGN in all
    >>the sources I have seen. For lots of languages.
    >Precisely. I meant that the glyph must be clearly distinct from
    >U+0062, and so should be identical to U+0446. The Pan-Turkic glyph
    >was probably really identical to the soft sign because printers
    >would have used the same type wherever possible.

    We agree! We agree! We agree!

    Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  *

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jan 05 2004 - 19:29:34 EST