Re: Latin letter GHA or Latin letter IO ?

From: Michael Everson (
Date: Mon Jan 05 2004 - 20:18:53 EST

  • Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: U+0185 in Zhuang and Azeri (was Re: unicode Digest V4 #3)"

    At 02:00 +0100 2004-01-06, Philippe Verdy wrote:
    >From: "Kenneth Whistler" <>
    >> When the combination of character name and representative
    >> glyph and associated informative annotations is insufficient
    >> to correctly identify a character in the standard, the
    >> recourse is to Ask the Experts and request further annotation
    >> of the standard to assist future users from running into the
    >> same problem.
    >Thanks for your view on this issue. It is far less extreme than the Michael
    >position, which just consists in saying "informative" without more
    >justification, when you clearly admit that they are also mandatory.

    Ken and I hold the same view and have the same position. Things may
    be mandatory and informative, or they may be mandatory and normative.

    Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  *

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jan 05 2004 - 20:56:30 EST