From: Michael Everson (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Jan 05 2004 - 20:18:53 EST
At 02:00 +0100 2004-01-06, Philippe Verdy wrote:
>From: "Kenneth Whistler" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> When the combination of character name and representative
>> glyph and associated informative annotations is insufficient
>> to correctly identify a character in the standard, the
>> recourse is to Ask the Experts and request further annotation
>> of the standard to assist future users from running into the
>> same problem.
>Thanks for your view on this issue. It is far less extreme than the Michael
>position, which just consists in saying "informative" without more
>justification, when you clearly admit that they are also mandatory.
Ken and I hold the same view and have the same position. Things may
be mandatory and informative, or they may be mandatory and normative.
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jan 05 2004 - 20:56:30 EST