From: Chris Jacobs (email@example.com)
Date: Thu Jan 15 2004 - 08:53:07 EST
WHY THEN DISTRIBUTES THE KLI SUCH A BLATANTLY UNCONFORMANT FONT?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Everson" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 1:15 PM
Subject: Re: Klingon
> At 11:15 +0100 2004-01-15, Chris Jacobs wrote:
> > > I had a problem with this too, for a while (previous discussion on this
> >> list helped clear it up). Klingon letters had been placed in the PUA by
> >> the CSUR (ConsScript Unicode Registry, an unofficial allocation of PUA
> >> space to constructed alphabets),
> >And did the Klingon Language Institute endorse that?
> Yes. See http://www.evertype.com/standards/csur/klingon.html
> The original encoding was made for some Linux implementation in 1995
> or 1996 I suppose.
> Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 15 2004 - 10:36:07 EST