Re: Unicode forms for internal storage

From: Elliotte Rusty Harold (
Date: Wed Jan 21 2004 - 07:02:14 EST

  • Next message: Elliotte Rusty Harold: "Re: Unicode forms for internal storage"

    At 10:24 AM +0000 1/21/04, Jon Hanna wrote:

    >Do you plan to support XML1.1 with XOM? The C0 controls forbidden in the 1.0
    >spec are allowed in the 1.1 spec if they appear as character references - so
    >this no longer holds (unless you store them as references or
    >otherwise escaped,
    >which would bring its own issues).

    No, I don't plan to support XML 1.1, certainly not in XOM 1.0 and
    beyond that not unless someone asks for it and demonstrates a real
    need. This is discussed in the XOM FAQ at

       Elliotte Rusty Harold
       Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003)           

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jan 21 2004 - 09:43:55 EST