From: John Jenkins (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed Jan 21 2004 - 12:58:15 EST
On Jan 20, 2004, at 6:14 PM, email@example.com wrote:
> Except that this character is listed in CJK Extension C, on page 612.
> (File: IRGN9285.PDF 08/06/02)
Irrelevant. Extension C isn't encoded yet. The UTC's intention is
that in the future, SC forms derivable algorithmically from their
encoded TC counterparts (and vice versa) should be represented with
variation selectors. Of course, whether WG2 will go along with this
idea is a different matter...
In fact, there are a dozen or thereabouts SC forms in Unicode's
proposal for Extension C. Our hope is that these will be encoded using
John H. Jenkins
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jan 21 2004 - 14:44:34 EST