From: Peter Kirk (email@example.com)
Date: Fri Jan 30 2004 - 05:58:53 EST
On 29/01/2004 09:52, Mark Davis wrote:
>I updated the charts -- please look them over.
>► शिष्यादिच्छेत्पराजयम् ◄
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Peter Kirk" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>To: "Unicode List" <email@example.com>
>Sent: Sat, 2004 Jan 17 13:52
>Subject: Collation charts out of date
>>The Unicode collation charts, at
>>http://www.unicode.org/charts/collation/, appear to 18 months out of
Thank you, Mark. These new charts look a lot better e.g. for Greek,
except for continued confusion at 03DE which seems to be a Mozilla 1.6
bug (still picking up the incorrect glyph from Arial Unicode MS although
I have specified another font for Greek).
It does look very odd that 1D28 has been separated from the other pi's,
1D29 from the other rho's etc. Is there a good reason for that? I know
everyone hates the UPA (except for Uralicists presumably), but these
letters are still clearly variants of pi and rho. The same applies to
the Latin small caps of course - why are they collated separately at the
first level when all other font variants are not?
-- Peter Kirk firstname.lastname@example.org (personal) email@example.com (work) http://www.qaya.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 30 2004 - 06:46:22 EST