Re: Panther PUA behavior

From: Peter Kirk (peterkirk@qaya.org)
Date: Thu Feb 05 2004 - 13:24:22 EST

  • Next message: jameskass@att.net: "RE: Infix profanity (Very OT) (was Phonology)"

    On 05/02/2004 09:12, jameskass@att.net wrote:

    >Doug Ewell wrote,
    >
    >
    >
    >>No, no, I know how ...
    >>
    >>
    >
    >I thought you might.
    >
    >
    >
    >>... I meant
    >>that because Windows doesn't do any fancy font switching in title bars
    >>to cover glyphs that aren't in the selected font ...
    >>
    >>
    >
    >It's too bad that these user-selectables don't allow for some kind of
    >prioritized font list. For "power users".
    >
    >Best regards,
    >
    >James Kass
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    You mean like what Mozilla does? Nice ideas there, but that system is so
    powerful (and its UI so inadequate) that it confuses even the power
    users. See e.g. http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=232657.

    -- 
    Peter Kirk
    peter@qaya.org (personal)
    peterkirk@qaya.org (work)
    http://www.qaya.org/
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Feb 05 2004 - 14:34:25 EST