From: Michael Everson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Feb 17 2004 - 18:36:54 EST
At 15:08 -0800 2004-02-17, Peter Kirk wrote:
>My point here is that if we once start on encoding subscript letters
>used in specialist scientific notation, there is no easy place to
We have so far encoded what people have been using.
>Either we need to accept the principle that subscripts are encodable
>and set aside space for a whole alphabet of them (and an upper case
>alphabet and a Greek alphabet as well, plus punctuation); or else we
>need to say from the start that these things are not plain text and
>should not be encoded in Unicode.
Or we do what we have done so far. Encode what people have been using.
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Feb 17 2004 - 19:29:28 EST