From: Michael Everson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Feb 19 2004 - 19:12:21 EST
At 14:14 -0800 2004-02-19, John Jenkins wrote:
>As a rule, no. Strokes are fragments of characters, not characters
>in their own right. There are some Chinese strokes encoded for
>various reasons, but there is no intention of ever providing an
>exhaustive catalog of strokes.
But of the 64 entities in that list, how many are encoded, and how
many are "standard" enough to merit consideration? I think that's
what the questioner was asking.
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Feb 19 2004 - 20:42:27 EST