Re: Codes for Individual Chinese Brushstrokes

From: Michael Everson (
Date: Thu Feb 19 2004 - 19:12:21 EST

  • Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Codes for Individual Chinese Brushstrokes"

    At 14:14 -0800 2004-02-19, John Jenkins wrote:
    >As a rule, no. Strokes are fragments of characters, not characters
    >in their own right. There are some Chinese strokes encoded for
    >various reasons, but there is no intention of ever providing an
    >exhaustive catalog of strokes.

    But of the 64 entities in that list, how many are encoded, and how
    many are "standard" enough to merit consideration? I think that's
    what the questioner was asking.

    Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  *

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Feb 19 2004 - 20:42:27 EST