From: Michael Everson (email@example.com)
Date: Thu Mar 18 2004 - 13:13:01 EST
At 09:49 -0800 2004-03-18, Mike Ayers wrote:
>Whoops! We forgot step 0, "Verify that it is in fact a
>character". This is where you should have stopped, as the glyph
>in question is used in the unique composition of exactly no words.
>It's a symbol, not a character.
Lots of symbols are characters.
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Mar 18 2004 - 13:58:39 EST