From: Peter Kirk (email@example.com)
Date: Thu Mar 25 2004 - 06:39:50 EST
On 24/03/2004 17:40, Doug Ewell wrote:
>Peter Kirk <peterkirk at qaya dot org> wrote:
>>And surely Braille could equally be considered a cipher of Latin
>>script (although the same symbols are also used as a cipher of other
>... which is one reason it can't be considered just a cipher of Latin.
> Fullerton, California
Well, we went through this one some months ago. There is a script, I've
forgotten its name, which is used as a cipher of Latin script and with
the same glyphs as a cipher of Hebrew script. Does that imply that this
script is not a cipher and so separately encodable?
-- Peter Kirk firstname.lastname@example.org (personal) email@example.com (work) http://www.qaya.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Mar 25 2004 - 07:19:12 EST