From: Philippe Verdy (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Mar 30 2004 - 19:42:13 EST
From: "Kenneth Whistler" <email@example.com>
> > Also RFC 1345 indicates that the standard C0 and C1
> > control sets of ISO 6429 (ECMA-48) are used with ISO 8859-1, but I
> > can't be certain if that is just the usual assumption or explicitly given
> > in ISO 8859.
> It has nothing to do with ISO/IEC 8859-1:1998, per se.
May be you could have corrected the "ISO 6429 (ECMA-48)" equivalence.
From what I read in ECMA-48, fifth edition, it extends the 4th edition which was
approved in ISO 6429.
But I don't think that the amendments in ECMA-48 for bidirectional controls
where included in a later edition of ISO 6429 for now.
Interestingly, I don't know if those controls added in the 5th edition of
ECMA-48 are encodable directly with Unicode, given that the "Bidi" controls that
are implemented are not completely equivalent to the Unicode Bidi format
controls (or at least I can't find a mapping for them because names don't
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Mar 30 2004 - 20:29:50 EST