From: Michael Everson (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Apr 05 2004 - 16:47:55 EDT
At 13:35 -0700 2004-04-05, Peter Kirk wrote:
>> The implication here is that plain text Unicode would be
>>used for legal documents. Given that my lawyer would send me
>>emails in highly marked up format, I find this very difficult to
>>grasp. Is there any evidence that plain text is even being
>>considered for use in legal documents?
>Evidence attached - one of many such legal texts on my computer,
>nearly all plain text only.
You are chasing a chimera, Peter.
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Apr 05 2004 - 17:28:07 EDT