From: Gary P. Grosso (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Apr 14 2004 - 16:35:01 EDT
Thanks, Frank. I hadn't found the grid index and it looks
worth remembering. But now I'm beginning to think I didn't
ask the right question.
Judging by what we saw in the back of the Unicode 2.0 book,
we would tend to say that it is correct that (in an index)
21333 (0x5355) is sorting under 21313 (0x5341) instead of
20843 (0x516b). I am looking for some table of radicals
that I can show our customer to help support that claim.
Perhaps I should start by asking for opinions on the above
sorting, and for guidelines on how best to govern such
decisions, though I'll admit I know less than the development
engineer involved, and so may be asking a less educated
question than we would have.
At 04:14 PM 4/14/2004 -0400, Frank Yung-Fong Tang wrote:
>are you talking about
>Gary P. Grosso wrote on 4/14/2004, 1:18 PM:
> > Hi,
> > I am looking for an up-to-date, online version of the sort of thing
> > I see in the back of the printed Unicode 2.0 book. All I can find
> > is a search engine thing, and that's real cool (I suppose) but I
> > need a "tableau", a complete picture, of the whole shebang. Can
> > someone please help me find my way?
> > Thanks,
> > Gary
> > ---
> > Gary Grosso
> > Arbortext, Inc.
> > Ann Arbor, MI, USA
--- Gary Grosso Arbortext, Inc. Ann Arbor, MI, USA
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 14 2004 - 17:23:57 EDT