RE: [OT] Even viruses are now i18n!

From: Jon Hanna (jon@hackcraft.net)
Date: Fri Apr 23 2004 - 09:50:54 EDT

  • Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: CLDR and locale designations (was: [OT] Even viruses are now i18n!)"

    Quoting Marco Cimarosti <marco.cimarosti@essetre.it>:

    > Antoine Leca wrote:
    > > The virus cannot have any knowledge of a language code. And
    > > much less of the language used by its next victim...
    >
    > It sends e-mails to addresses stolen from the previous victim's address
    > list, so it can analyze the top-level domain of these addresses (".it",
    > ".fr", etc.). Although, strictly speaking, these domains normally correspond
    > to *country* codes, they are a pretty good hint of the language of the next
    > victim.

    An extremely good hint given that the goal is to infect as many machines as
    possible as quickly as possible, anything that gets more than 50% accuracy
    should be considered a successful approach in that context.

    If the authorities find the author I doubt the robustness of the
    content-language heuristic will be top of the list of things they want to
    discuss.

    -- 
    Jon Hanna
    <http://www.hackcraft.net/>
    "…it has been truly said that hackers have even more words for
    equipment failures than Yiddish has for obnoxious people." - jargon.txt
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Apr 23 2004 - 11:25:33 EDT