From: Peter Constable (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sat Apr 24 2004 - 19:08:34 EDT
> From: Philippe Verdy [mailto:email@example.com]
> In fact I would like to see that "Traditional" and "Simplified"
> distinct languages in the same family. And an application would better
> and "zhs" language codes to make the distinction, so that "zh" would
> become an
> identifier for a family of Han-written languages, rather than a
> identifier, and so a legacy code.
In ISO 639-3, zh will be considered a macro-language identifier. But zhs
and zht would not be good ideas, and will not be considered for ISO 639
or for RFC 3066.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Apr 24 2004 - 19:37:46 EDT