Re: Proposal to add 2 Romanian characters

From: Cristian Secarã (
Date: Tue Apr 27 2004 - 02:41:54 EDT

  • Next message: Shawn Steele: "RE: Proposal to add 2 Romanian characters"

    On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 20:14:46 -0700, Michael (michka) Kaplan wrote:

    > No general use Romanian keyboard should try to support such characters, any
    > more than other general use keyboard of *any* language would do this.

    Yes, I agree.

    On the other hand, a passive presence of a valid [extremely rarely
    used] character that can be obtained by an <existing_dead_key> +
    <existing_character_on_keyboadr> is not such a catastrophic thing
    either, even if this [extremely rarely used] is outside the current
    codepage. Or so I think.
    In my case, this apply for the existing Unicode characters
    <a + circumflex + acute> and <a + breve + acute>
    (which will be thrown away, because of lack of consistency with the
    other missing one)


    Cristian Secarã

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Apr 27 2004 - 03:07:39 EDT