From: Cristian Secarã (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Apr 27 2004 - 02:41:54 EDT
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 20:14:46 -0700, Michael (michka) Kaplan wrote:
> No general use Romanian keyboard should try to support such characters, any
> more than other general use keyboard of *any* language would do this.
Yes, I agree.
On the other hand, a passive presence of a valid [extremely rarely
used] character that can be obtained by an <existing_dead_key> +
<existing_character_on_keyboadr> is not such a catastrophic thing
either, even if this [extremely rarely used] is outside the current
codepage. Or so I think.
In my case, this apply for the existing Unicode characters
<a + circumflex + acute> and <a + breve + acute>
(which will be thrown away, because of lack of consistency with the
other missing one)
-- Cristian Secarã http://www.secarica.ro/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Apr 27 2004 - 03:07:39 EDT