Re: New contribution

From: Andrew C. West (
Date: Thu Apr 29 2004 - 10:32:45 EDT

  • Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Defined Private Use was: SSP default ignorable characters"

    On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 09:58:11 -0400, Patrick Andries wrote:
    > Andrew C. West a écrit :
    > >Hmm, the problem is that the more "experts" that are involved the more
    > >it is that any sort of consensus can be reached, especially if, as is often
    > >case, they lack the understanding of encoding issues and principles that
    > >possesses.
    > >
    > >
    > [PA] What are the encoding issues here that "experts" would not possess ?

    I was stating a general principle here. I don't know what particular encoding
    issues may be associated with Phoenician, but few scripts left to be encoded are
    so simple as to be devoid of any encoding issues. And in general scholars who
    are experts in a particular script may not fully understand -- or be willing to
    recognise -- the encoding issues involved. In particular, they may be unwilling
    to accept Unicode's character-glyph model.


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Apr 29 2004 - 11:27:52 EDT