Re: Defined Private Use was: SSP default ignorable characters

From: Mark E. Shoulson (mark@kli.org)
Date: Thu Apr 29 2004 - 21:12:21 EDT

Next message: Mark E. Shoulson: "Re: An attempt to focus the PUA discussion [long]"

Previous message: Peter Constable: "RE: Public Review Issues Updated"
In reply to: Doug Ewell: "Re: Defined Private Use was: SSP default ignorable characters"
Next in thread: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Defined Private Use was: SSP default ignorable characters"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Doug Ewell wrote:

>
>FWIW, in my sample Ewellic-script Web pages, I indicated the encoding in
>two different ways:
>
>[.....]
>(2) indirectly, by requesting a specific font that supports it, using an
>inline style sheet:
>
><style type="text/css">
>
></style>
>
This is essentially what I did in
http://www.kli.org/QQ/QQ0404.html?mode=UTF (et al), specifying Code2000
and ClearlyU (which also supports the CSUR assignments).