From: Peter Constable (petercon@microsoft.com)
Date: Fri Apr 30 2004 - 10:00:50 EDT
> From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org]
On
> Behalf Of John Cowan
> Here's what I find: Fraser needs turned A, B, C, D, E, F, G, J, L, P,
> R, T, U, V, and W; also reversed K (but I wonder if turned K is
equally
> recognizable).
I've always assumed that they just took Latin type, ignored the
lowercase, and turned some of the caps over. If that's the case, I would
assume the answer is yes.
> One could argue, I suppose, that Latin caps are too flexible for
Fraser,
> which seems to want very simple block-style glyphs
But that is a typeface distinction, not a script distinction.
Peter Constable
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Apr 30 2004 - 10:51:29 EDT