RE: Fraser

From: Peter Constable (
Date: Fri Apr 30 2004 - 10:00:50 EDT

  • Next message: Dean Snyder: "Re: New contribution"

    > From: []
    > Behalf Of John Cowan

    > Here's what I find: Fraser needs turned A, B, C, D, E, F, G, J, L, P,
    > R, T, U, V, and W; also reversed K (but I wonder if turned K is
    > recognizable).

    I've always assumed that they just took Latin type, ignored the
    lowercase, and turned some of the caps over. If that's the case, I would
    assume the answer is yes.

    > One could argue, I suppose, that Latin caps are too flexible for
    > which seems to want very simple block-style glyphs

    But that is a typeface distinction, not a script distinction.

    Peter Constable

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Apr 30 2004 - 10:51:29 EDT