From: Michael Everson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri Apr 30 2004 - 14:36:46 EDT
At 06:39 -0700 2004-04-30, Peter Constable wrote:
>Has it struck anyone else that it might make best sense to consider
>Fraser just an extension of Latin -- so we just need to encode the
>turned capitals? Or is there more to it I'm not thinking about?
Evidence (or lack thereof) suggests that Fraser doesn't participate
in the normal behaviour of Latin, including its glyph variation, its
cursivity in writing, its casing behaviour, even italicization as
opposed to obliquity.
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Apr 30 2004 - 15:50:29 EDT