Date: Sat May 01 2004 - 14:17:35 CST
Peter Kirk wrote,
> This pedagogical usage is not in plain text, or at least plain text
> usage has not been demonstrated. I think I asked before and didn't
> receive an answer: should Unicode encode a script whose ONLY
> demonstrated usage is in alphabet charts? I think the answer is not,
> because essentially these charts are graphics of glyphs, not text.
I wonder where the folks who made those charts got those glyphs?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 07 2004 - 18:45:25 CDT