From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Tue May 04 2004 - 06:16:47 CDT
At 23:08 -0400 2004-05-03, John Cowan wrote:
>jameskass@att.net scripsit:
>
>> Those objections are quite generic and could be made just as well
>> for N'ko, Ol Cemet', Egyptian Hieroglyphics, &c.
>
>But there is no clear-cut alternative for any of those. N'ko encoding
>is font-kludge, Unicode, or nothing. Here there is a fourth possibility:
>decide that Phoenician is a "script variant" in the sense of ISO 15924.
But it would be wrong to do that.
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 07 2004 - 18:45:25 CDT