Re: New contribution

From: C J Fynn (cfynn@gmx.net)
Date: Tue May 04 2004 - 08:15:06 CDT


 "John Hudson" <tiro@tiro.com> wrote:

> jameskass@att.net wrote:
>
> > While the fact that it's called Phoenician script doesn't prove anything
> > about its origin, it might be considered indicative of the path through
> > which the script was borrowed.

> Indeed. This is the point I made earlier: Greco-centric European scholarship
of writing
> systems calls the script 'Phoenician' because the Greeks derived their
alphabet from trade
> contact with the Phoenicians. As should be obvious from recent debate,
semiticists look at
> the old Canaanite writing systems in a different way.

So are "Greco-centric European scholars" / "Indo-Europeanists" the
user community which some were trying to say doesn't exist?

- Chris



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 07 2004 - 18:45:25 CDT