From: Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Apr 28 2004 - 09:24:26 CST
On 2004.04.27, 07:41, Cristian Secarã <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On the other hand, a passive presence of a valid [extremely rarely
> used] character that can be obtained by an <existing_dead_key> +
> <existing_character_on_keyboadr> is not such a catastrophic thing
OTOH, it seems to be a good thing, IMHO. In the usual pt-PT keyboard,
f.i., we have five dead keys (´`¨~^) and these support a lot of
characters that are NOT used in Portuguese spelling: ýäëïöèìòùñîû.
Indeed all combinations of those five combining characters with any
base letter present in ISO:8859-1 are implemented, allowing for
correct spelling of French, Italian, Dutch and English, plus also
Castillian (but for "¿¡") and German (but for "ß").
Nothing catastrophic about this!
P.S.: With Keyman I extended this to all possible combinations (using
precomposed Unicode chars when avaliable, for the time being), adding
also other diacriticals (hacheck, brachia, macron etc) to RAlt + dead
keys. Too bad Keyman still messes the NumPad for pt-PT keyboards. :-(
António MARTINS-Tuválkin | ()|
PT-1XXX-XXX LISBOA Não me invejo de quem tem |
+351 934 821 700 carros, parelhas e montes |
http://www.tuvalkin.web.pt/bandeira/ só me invejo de quem bebe |
http://pagina.de/bandeiras/ a água em todas as fontes |
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 07 2004 - 18:45:26 CDT