From: Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri May 07 2004 - 11:32:11 CDT
On 2004.05.07, 02:41, D. Starner <email@example.com> wrote:
>> I'd guess that typographically it is indeed a turned c-cedilla, a
>> hack for an open o with "something" above
> Perhaps it's inaccurate to call it an open-o: c and ç are ʃ
> and θ respectively, and ɔ and this new character are the
> medial/sonant-surd forms of this unturned versions.
Aaahhh, I got it 180° wrong! It's not the turned U+00E7 that is used
atypically here, but rather the U+0186...
> But turned-c is LATIN SMALL LETTER OPEN O, IMO.
Agreed. Just like U+0077 has quite different values in, say, Polish
(P.S.: I could not find anything about Dorsey's spelling on the web.)
António MARTINS-Tuválkin | ()|
PT-1XXX-XXX LISBOA Não me invejo de quem tem |
+351 934 821 700 carros, parelhas e montes |
http://www.tuvalkin.web.pt/bandeira/ só me invejo de quem bebe |
http://pagina.de/bandeiras/ a água em todas as fontes |
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 07 2004 - 18:45:26 CDT