RE: interleaved ordering (was RE: Phoenician)

From: Jony Rosenne ([email protected])
Date: Wed May 12 2004 - 18:33:32 CDT

Next message: E. Keown: "Re: Coptic/Greek (Re: Phoenician)"

Previous message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Writing Tatar using the Latin script; new characters to encode?"
In reply to: Mike Ayers: "RE: interleaved ordering (was RE: Phoenician)"
Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "Re: interleaved ordering (was RE: Phoenician)"
Reply: Philippe Verdy: "Re: interleaved ordering (was RE: Phoenician)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I don't think so. I think they would require some computer expert to set it
up for them.

Jony

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Mike Ayers
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 6:51 PM
To: '[email protected]'; [email protected]
Subject: RE: interleaved ordering (was RE: Phoenician)

...

I agree with those who think that interleaving Phoenician ad Hebrew
would not be a good default. I've asked it before and I'll ask it again: is
it not correct that language scholars are those most likely to be able to
create and use a nondefault sort order?

/|/|ike

Next message: E. Keown: "Re: Coptic/Greek (Re: Phoenician)"
Previous message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Writing Tatar using the Latin script; new characters to encode?"
In reply to: Mike Ayers: "RE: interleaved ordering (was RE: Phoenician)"
Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "Re: interleaved ordering (was RE: Phoenician)"
Reply: Philippe Verdy: "Re: interleaved ordering (was RE: Phoenician)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed May 12 2004 - 17:35:18 CDT