Re: Coptic/Greek (Re: Phoenician)

Date: Thu May 13 2004 - 10:19:09 CDT

  • Next message: Language Analysis Systems, Inc. Unicode list reader: "RE: interleaved ordering (was RE: Phoenician)"

    Peter Kirk scripsit:

    > I support Coptic disunification on the grounds that it was requested by
    > the user community. Initially I opposed Phoenician disunification
    > because there was no evidence of demand for it from users. As such
    > evidence has now been produced, I now support Phoenician disunification,
    > according to Michael Everson's proposal. Please note carefully this last
    > sentence.

    I agree entirely.

    John Cowan
    Promises become binding when there is a meeting of the minds and consideration
    is exchanged. So it was at King's Bench in common law England; so it was
    under the common law in the American colonies; so it was through more than
    two centuries of jurisprudence in this country; and so it is today. 
           --Specht v. Netscape

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 13 2004 - 10:19:58 CDT