Re: interleaved ordering (was RE: Phoenician)

From: Dean Snyder (dean.snyder@jhu.edu)
Date: Thu May 13 2004 - 10:46:45 CDT

Next message: Patrick Andries: "Re: Coptic/Greek (Re: Phoenician)"

Previous message: Dean Snyder: "Archaic-Greek/Palaeo-Hebrew (was, interleaved ordering; was, Phoenician)"
In reply to: Ernest Cline: "Re: interleaved ordering (was RE: Phoenician)"
Next in thread: D. Starner: "RE: interleaved ordering (was RE: Phoenician)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Ernest Cline wrote at 10:34 PM on Wednesday, May 12, 2004:

>But the only example shown during this discussion has been the use
>of Paleo-Hebrew for the tetragrammaton.

You may have missed my email about the side by side usage of Palaeo-
Hebrew and Jewish Hebrew in the Dead Sea scrolls and other
contemporaneous documents.

Respectfully,

Dean A. Snyder

Assistant Research Scholar
Manager, Digital Hammurabi Project
Computer Science Department
Whiting School of Engineering
218C New Engineering Building
3400 North Charles Street
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, USA 21218

office: 410 516-6850
cell: 717 817-4897
www.jhu.edu/digitalhammurabi

Next message: Patrick Andries: "Re: Coptic/Greek (Re: Phoenician)"
Previous message: Dean Snyder: "Archaic-Greek/Palaeo-Hebrew (was, interleaved ordering; was, Phoenician)"
In reply to: Ernest Cline: "Re: interleaved ordering (was RE: Phoenician)"
Next in thread: D. Starner: "RE: interleaved ordering (was RE: Phoenician)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 13 2004 - 10:47:27 CDT