Re: Coptic/Greek (Re: Phoenician)

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Thu May 13 2004 - 12:59:02 CDT

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Archaic-Greek/Palaeo-Hebrew (was, interleaved ordering; was, Phoenician)"

Previous message: Dean Snyder: "Re: Archaic-Greek/Palaeo-Hebrew (was, interleaved ordering; was, Phoenician)"
In reply to: Patrick Andries: "Re: Coptic/Greek (Re: Phoenician)"
Next in thread: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Coptic/Greek (Re: Phoenician)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 12:25 -0400 2004-05-13, Mr Kirk wrote:

>I now support Phoenician disunification, according to Michael
>Everson's proposal.

The Phoenician script was *never* unified with the Hebrew script by
UTC or WG2. It was mistakenly proposed to be unified; it is *that*
proposal which failed. It is an error to talk about "Phoenician
disunification".

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Archaic-Greek/Palaeo-Hebrew (was, interleaved ordering; was, Phoenician)"
Previous message: Dean Snyder: "Re: Archaic-Greek/Palaeo-Hebrew (was, interleaved ordering; was, Phoenician)"
In reply to: Patrick Andries: "Re: Coptic/Greek (Re: Phoenician)"
Next in thread: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Coptic/Greek (Re: Phoenician)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 13 2004 - 13:00:12 CDT