Date: Tue May 18 2004 - 14:57:25 CDT
Andrew C. West scripsit:
> It does ? I thought that the whole point of much of the recent discussion was
> the uncertainty of how Ogham should be laid out in vertically formatted text,
> such as when embedded in Mongolian or vertical Chinese.
What's uncertain is whether a lr or a rl progression is favored, given the
paucity of evidence. Michael favors lr progression. There is no question
that the text is read BTT.
-- "They tried to pierce your heart John Cowan with a Morgul-knife that remains in the http://www.ccil.org/~cowan wound. If they had succeeded, you would http://www.reutershealth.com become a wraith under the domination of the Dark Lord." --Gandalf
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 18 2004 - 14:59:04 CDT