RE: ISO 15924 draft fixes

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Thu May 20 2004 - 12:21:16 CDT

  • Next message: Michael Everson: "RE: ISO 15924 "code"s and "ID"s"

    At 09:49 -0700 2004-05-20, Peter Constable wrote:
    > > From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org]
    >On Behalf
    >> Of Michael Everson
    >
    >> I hope this satisfies you.
    >http://www.unicode.org/iso15924/codelists.html
    >
    >If they are consistent and reliable, I'm satisfied with them. I hope you
    >will be preparing a page for corrigenda / errata.

    That's what http://www.unicode.org/iso15924/codechanges.html is for.

    >It's not a big issue, but I don't understand why the dates don't match:
    >was "Arab" added on January 9 or May 1? So, they're not entirely
    >consistent.

    Because long long ago when I thought that ISO was going to publish
    the document on my birthday (sigh) I put 2004-01-09 on the document;
    that didn't happen, and it wasn't published until 2004-05-01.

    >Also, it appears you have not fixed a serious error in the
    >plain-text file: it is not well-structured. Some rows have 6
    >columns, and some have 7.

    That might be fixed in the newest one.

    -- 
    Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 20 2004 - 12:24:36 CDT