From: John Cowan (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu May 20 2004 - 20:35:48 CDT
Kenneth Whistler scripsit:
> The question is rather, given the fundamental nature of the
> Unicode Standard as enabling text processing for modern
> software, it is cost-effective and *reasonable* to provide
> a Unicode encoding for one particular script or another,
> unencoded to date, so as to maximize the chances that it
> will be handled more easily by modern software in the global
> infrastructure and to minimize the costs associated with
> doing so.
These words (and indeed your entire posting) deserve to be written
up in letters of gold somewhere.
-- LEAR: Dost thou call me fool, boy? John Cowan FOOL: All thy other titles http://www.ccil.org/~cowan thou hast given away: email@example.com That thou wast born with. http://www.reutershealth.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 20 2004 - 20:35:54 CDT